<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the matter of Google and &#8220;Search Neutrality&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ia-blog.com/2010/02/16/on-the-matter-of-google-and-search-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ia-blog.com/2010/02/16/on-the-matter-of-google-and-search-neutrality/</link>
	<description>A blog by Robert Berkman, Editor, The Information Advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ling Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.ia-blog.com/2010/02/16/on-the-matter-of-google-and-search-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Ling Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ia-blog.com/?p=172#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>“NPR for search” --- what a wonderful and creative idea! It might be a long journey for us to get there, simply because of the funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“NPR for search” &#8212; what a wonderful and creative idea! It might be a long journey for us to get there, simply because of the funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Berkman</title>
		<link>http://www.ia-blog.com/2010/02/16/on-the-matter-of-google-and-search-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Berkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ia-blog.com/?p=172#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>Kristin--Good point, and that is something I considered as well. I&#039;m thinking that perhaps a publicly funded search engine could be less ambitious than a Google, perhaps indexing a subset of public policy related information; or some other niche feature geared specifically for people who may not need to search the entire Web, but want to use one free from any commercial motive alltogether.

Devil is in the details of course...and it would be a hard nut to crack. I&#039;m wondering if some of this may be happening in a country like France, who has some concerns about a Google cultural monopoly over information, and whose culture would be more public-friendly vs. private sector than the U.S. anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristin&#8211;Good point, and that is something I considered as well. I&#8217;m thinking that perhaps a publicly funded search engine could be less ambitious than a Google, perhaps indexing a subset of public policy related information; or some other niche feature geared specifically for people who may not need to search the entire Web, but want to use one free from any commercial motive alltogether.</p>
<p>Devil is in the details of course&#8230;and it would be a hard nut to crack. I&#8217;m wondering if some of this may be happening in a country like France, who has some concerns about a Google cultural monopoly over information, and whose culture would be more public-friendly vs. private sector than the U.S. anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KristinFromIntellogist</title>
		<link>http://www.ia-blog.com/2010/02/16/on-the-matter-of-google-and-search-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator>KristinFromIntellogist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ia-blog.com/?p=172#comment-1472</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of a publicly funded search engine in theory, but I believe Google&#039;s search engine is so good because they&#039;re constantly investing time and energy into adjusting what it does.  I&#039;m not against government programs in general, but I feel that a government or non-profit effort might have difficulty keeping up with the technology status quo unless extremely well funded and highly motivated. Otherwise people would flock to the corporate offerings because they are &quot;better&quot; at search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of a publicly funded search engine in theory, but I believe Google&#8217;s search engine is so good because they&#8217;re constantly investing time and energy into adjusting what it does.  I&#8217;m not against government programs in general, but I feel that a government or non-profit effort might have difficulty keeping up with the technology status quo unless extremely well funded and highly motivated. Otherwise people would flock to the corporate offerings because they are &#8220;better&#8221; at search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pp</title>
		<link>http://www.ia-blog.com/2010/02/16/on-the-matter-of-google-and-search-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-1469</link>
		<dc:creator>pp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ia-blog.com/?p=172#comment-1469</guid>
		<description>OK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anne whitefield</title>
		<link>http://www.ia-blog.com/2010/02/16/on-the-matter-of-google-and-search-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>anne whitefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ia-blog.com/?p=172#comment-1464</guid>
		<description>I agree that the problem of searches being unfairly skewed presents itself now and in the future. Public funds, administered by government for an &quot;NPR for search&quot; can also be corrupted, hence the often biased and edited news and comment by NPR.
But if a public search engine were funded at point of purchase, either attached to the price of a computer or online capable electronics or to the price of connectivity, it might work after if it received a start-up grant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the problem of searches being unfairly skewed presents itself now and in the future. Public funds, administered by government for an &#8220;NPR for search&#8221; can also be corrupted, hence the often biased and edited news and comment by NPR.<br />
But if a public search engine were funded at point of purchase, either attached to the price of a computer or online capable electronics or to the price of connectivity, it might work after if it received a start-up grant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

