<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Forrester Market Study on Blog Monitoring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ia-blog.com/2006/10/17/free-forrester-market-study-on-blog-monitoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ia-blog.com/2006/10/17/free-forrester-market-study-on-blog-monitoring/</link>
	<description>A blog by Robert Berkman, Editor, The Information Advisor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.ia-blog.com/2006/10/17/free-forrester-market-study-on-blog-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iablog.onlineinc.com/?p=72#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Hello Robert,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I came across this post while doing some research.  Someone else asked me the same question - I asked him to post it on my blog and I responded there as well:  http://www.beingpeterkim.com/2006/09/forresters_q3_2.html.  Forrester has a strict policy on how vendors cite Wave data.  Moreover, there is no &quot;pay for play&quot; involved in the evaluation process.  Sorry for the delay in responding, but you would have gotten an answer to your question a lot quicker if you had just dropped a quick email or made a call.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My prior comments, which apply to your post as well:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;The brand monitoring wave consists of eight parts - one main overview&lt;br/&gt;document which contains the market overview and side-by-side comparison tool. Then there is a detailed scorecard for each vendor that describes particular strengths and weaknesses of their solution.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Vendors often purchase reprint rights for a period of time, six months I&lt;br/&gt;think. My guess is that they would typically purchase the rights to&lt;br/&gt;their own scorecard and possibly the overview. However, they can&#039;t&lt;br/&gt;redistribute the comparison tool, which is important so clients can&lt;br/&gt;customize the criteria based on their own needs. This is a critical&lt;br/&gt;element of the Wave, which allows a client-side marketer to essentially&lt;br/&gt;shortcut an evaluation process dramatically, because we&#039;ve done all the&lt;br/&gt;heavy research and analysis already that an RFP typically involves.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BTW Cymfony has also made reprints available through their site. I&#039;ve&lt;br/&gt;seen the links there and from Nielsen Buzzmetrics, but not sure exactly&lt;br/&gt;what&#039;s on offer.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So hopefully that clears things up - there is no &quot;pay to play&quot; for&lt;br/&gt;participating in a wave, nor any compensation provided to vendors for&lt;br/&gt;being included. You&#039;ll never see a Wave distributed for free directly&lt;br/&gt;from Forrester.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Robert,</p>
<p>I came across this post while doing some research.  Someone else asked me the same question &#8211; I asked him to post it on my blog and I responded there as well:  <a href="http://www.beingpeterkim.com/2006/09/forresters_q3_2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.beingpeterkim.com/2006/09/forresters_q3_2.html</a>.  Forrester has a strict policy on how vendors cite Wave data.  Moreover, there is no &#8220;pay for play&#8221; involved in the evaluation process.  Sorry for the delay in responding, but you would have gotten an answer to your question a lot quicker if you had just dropped a quick email or made a call.</p>
<p>My prior comments, which apply to your post as well:</p>
<p>&#8220;The brand monitoring wave consists of eight parts &#8211; one main overview<br />document which contains the market overview and side-by-side comparison tool. Then there is a detailed scorecard for each vendor that describes particular strengths and weaknesses of their solution.</p>
<p>Vendors often purchase reprint rights for a period of time, six months I<br />think. My guess is that they would typically purchase the rights to<br />their own scorecard and possibly the overview. However, they can&#8217;t<br />redistribute the comparison tool, which is important so clients can<br />customize the criteria based on their own needs. This is a critical<br />element of the Wave, which allows a client-side marketer to essentially<br />shortcut an evaluation process dramatically, because we&#8217;ve done all the<br />heavy research and analysis already that an RFP typically involves.</p>
<p>BTW Cymfony has also made reprints available through their site. I&#8217;ve<br />seen the links there and from Nielsen Buzzmetrics, but not sure exactly<br />what&#8217;s on offer.</p>
<p>So hopefully that clears things up &#8211; there is no &#8220;pay to play&#8221; for<br />participating in a wave, nor any compensation provided to vendors for<br />being included. You&#8217;ll never see a Wave distributed for free directly<br />from Forrester.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

